Legal Opinion
Park At Cross Creek, LLC v. City of Mali
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 21, 2017No. B271620; B275311PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAldrich, J.
*1199In November 2014, the voters of Malibu enacted Measure R, an initiative designed to limit large developments and chain establishments. The Park at Cross Creek, LLC (The Park) and Malibu Bay Company (Malibu Bay), both of which were developing projects in Malibu, petitioned the trial court to have Measure R declared invalid. The court granted that petition. Appellants the City of Malibu and interveners Dru Ann Dixon-Jacobsen, Carol Moss and Michele Reiner (the official proponents of Measure *1200R) appeal.1 We conclude that Measure R exceeds the initiative power and is illegal. We therefore affirm…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Santa Barbara School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Citizens' Committee to Complete the Refuge v. City of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Nicholas Honchariw v. County of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Petrovich Development Co., LLC v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Save Civita Because Sudberry Won't v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.