Anza Parking Corp. v. City of Burlingame
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Plaintiff Anza Parking Corporation appeals from a judgment of the superior court denying its application for a writ of mandate requiring the City of Burlingame to “enforce” a conditional use permit, and for damages against the city.
We have read and considered the briefs of the parties and of the real parties in interest, and we consider, as requested, our records on an appeal numbered A037668, from a judgment in a separate action of Anza Parking Corporation for damages against the City of Burlingame. And for the reasons we now relate, we shall affirm the judgment from…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- County of Imperial v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- California Coastal Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ponderosa Homes, Inc. v. City of San RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Malibu Mountains Recreation, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gonzalez v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Anderson v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.