Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple Valley
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ, P. J.
Plaintiff Maintain Our Desert Environment (MODE) appeals from the denial of its petition for a writ of mandate seeking to compel defendant Town of Apple Valley (Town) to set aside actions that it took to approve a development project (Project) proposed by real party in interest, Pluto Development, Inc. (Pluto). MODE asserts that the trial court erred when it denied the writ because Town did not comply with mandatory provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) prior to approving the Project. We disagree and affirm.
Fac…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Mani Bros. Real Estate Group v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.