Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael J. Bear
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1991No. 89-30200PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
Bear appeals his conviction for burglary pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1153. He contends that the district court erred by sentencing him under the federal Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) rather than under Idaho sentencing law. The district court possessed jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1153. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate Bear’s sentence and remand to the district court for resentencing under Idaho law.
I
On December 16, 1988, a federal grand jury indicted Bear, an Indian, for second degree burglary of a residence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Diego RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Laszlo PomaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wilmer LOMAYAOMA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Other MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Victor Reza-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.