Legal Opinion
Nelson v. City of Irvine
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1998No. 96-56813PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
David Nelson and Mauricio Fernandez, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (hereafter collectively “Nelson”), appeal from the district court’s judgment on the pleadings in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Irvine, its chief of police, and several individual officers (hereafter collectively “City of Irvine”), alleging that following their arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol they were coerced into submitting to blood tests in order to determine their blood alcohol level, and deprived of the statutorily mandated option to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Alexandria Gregg v. Hawaii Dept. of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Melissa Knibbs v. Anthony Momphard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- MacDonald v. Grace Church SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.