Legal Opinion

United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2002No. 00-30411PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises difficult and complex questions relating to federal jurisdiction over Native American juveniles. Once again, we must revisit the interplay of two statutes granting federal jurisdiction: those governing criminal jurisdiction over Native Americans and those governing federal juvenile delinquency. Both grants of jurisdiction, on their own, have provoked concern about the reach of the federal government and the rights of those brought into court via these statutes. Together, the concern is even greater.

Pierre Y. (“Pierre”) is a Native American…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Kevin Joseph BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. In re: Benjamin Moonkang HuhUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Efrain Becerra-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API