United States v. Victor Reza-Ramos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IEUTA, Circuit Judge:
Victor Reza-Ramos, a non-Indian, appeals from his judgmént of conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1111, the federal murder statute, following his jury trial for the murder of Jose Flores oh the Tohono O’od-ham Indian reservation in Arizona. We conclude that § 1111 was applicable to Reza-Ramos under the Indian General Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1152, which (among other things) makes federal crimi- ml law applicable in federal enclaves when the defendant is a non-Indian and the victim is an Indian, because the government adduced sufficient evidence to establish that Flores was…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Edgar Alvirez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Berry v. BacaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.