Legal Opinion

State v. Seneff

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1980No. 41927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, P. J.

The defendant-appellant, Richard Seneff, was indicted for and convicted of bribery for soliciting and accepting valuable consideration to influence him with respect to the discharge of his duty as a Cleveland police officer. He asserts on appeal that the trial court’s instructions to the jury were erroneous.

First Assignment of Error:

“Upon evidence which raised a factual dispute concerning an essential element of R. C. §2921.02(B) (bribery), whether a police officer-defendant is engaged in the discharge of his duties when pursuing a certain activity during off-duty hours, the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. State v. NaboznyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. SargentOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. McKelveyOhio Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. Van GundyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PendergrassMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. SwansonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. City of Cleveland v. BuckleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API