Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Buckley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1990No. 56997PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patton, Chief Justice.

Defendant Donald Buckley was found guilty of pandering obscenity in violation of R.C. 2907.32(A)(4). Buckley’s twelve assigned errors contest that conviction.

Defendant was an employee at the Downtown News and Books, a bookstore offering general interest and adult titles for sale. In the rear of the store were numerous private booths in which customers could insert a token and view portions of sexually explicit videotapes. Tokens could be purchased at the sales counter.

On June 22, 1988, a Cleveland Police Strike Force detective entered the bookstore and purchased $5 worth…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BlankenshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. DickessOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. SmelcerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API