State v. Sargent
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Celebrezze. J.
This appeal calls upon us to decide whether, when the trial court allowed the patrolman to testify concerning his observation of appellee during a telephone conversation with his attorney, appellee’s right to effective counsel was violated.
Appellant argues that there is no such constitutional right involved in the present situation and that the requirements of E. C. 2935.20 were met.
E. C. 2935.20, in pertinent part, provides:.“After the arrest, detention, or any other taking into custody of a person, with or without a warrant, such person shall be permitted forthwith facilities…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CoryWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. TheisenOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- McGoon v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- State v. StubbsOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. ForteOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JesterOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. Van GundyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MilliganOhio Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.