Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-1209PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to determine the propriety of the death sentence imposed on appellant, we are required to undertake a three-prong analysis. First, we must answer the specific issues raised by the appellant with respect to the proceedings below. Second, we must independently weigh the aggravating circumstances in this cause against any factors which mitigate against the imposition of the death sentence. Last, we must independently consider whether appellant’s sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases.

In his first proposition of law, appellant contends that the trial judge…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API