State v. Nabozny
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
Appellant has presented for this court’s consideration 26 propositions of law.
I
The first four propositions of law present questions concerning the constitutionality of this state’s death penalty and related statutes. Appellant argues first that the statutory scheme, in violation of the due-process clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions, discriminates between those defendants who plead guilty or no contest to aggravated murder and those defendants who exercise their constitutional right to plead not guilty and proceed to trial. Specifically, appellant asserts that then Crim. R.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.