Legal Opinion

State v. McKelvey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1967No. 40668PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWasserman, J.

The basic questions raised by this case are created by the statutes providing for travel allowances for county officials and authorizing civil suit by the prosecuting attorney to recover misapplied county funds.

Appellee contends that no breach of duty occurred when he accepted mileage money from other county officials who had first received this money from the county. Appellee’s contention shows that he is mistaken as to the intent of Section 325.20, Revised Code, which provides, in part:

“Except as otherwise provided by law, no elected county officer, and no deputy or employee of the county,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Leis v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Halliday v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. BidwillIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. LozanoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Speckels v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. SeneffOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Kleemann v. Carriage Trace, Inc., 21873 (8-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API