Dunlap v. Larkin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
The issues on appeal arise from a confusing mélange of three consolidated actions, one in equity for an injunction, a zoning appeal, and an action in ejectment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Before addressing appellants’ contentions, we must first set out the relevant facts. Appellants, plaintiffs below, filed a complaint seeking a preliminary injunction to restrain appellees, defendants below, from erecting a building on appellees’ property located at 142 Main Street, Tidioute Borough, Warren County, Pennsylvania. The gist of the April 19, 1982 complaint was that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moyerman v. GlanzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Bodman v. BodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Minteer v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Murphy v. Cartex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Beary v. Container General Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Walley v. IracaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Summit Fasteners, Inc. v. Harleysville National Bank & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Chicchi v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.