Legal Opinion
Chicchi v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 1999PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIRARCHI, Jr., Senior Judge.
Robert Chicchi (Chicchi) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying his motion for post-trial relief in his action against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and its locomotive engineer, Kurt Forsey (collectively, SEPTA). We affirm.
Chicchi commenced the instant action, alleging that he sustained serious injuries on April 20, 1994 at approximately 9:00 a.m., when he was struck by a commuter train operated by SEPTA, and that his injuries were caused by SEPTA’s negligent, reckless, willful and wanton conduct.
At…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Whyte v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- General Equipment Manufacturers v. Westfield InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Kriner v. McDonaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Milan v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Agrecycle, Inc. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Koken v. Colonial Assurance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Johnson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Burke v. Buck Hotel, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.