Legal Opinion

Moyerman v. Glanzberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1958No. Appeals, 87 and 88PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

On August 28,1953, Samuel Moyerman and Ms wife, the appellants, conveyed to Jules Glanzberg and his wife a vacant lot in Cheltenham Township, Montgomery County. This lot had a frontage of 80.38 feet, a depth •of 175 feet and a rear width of 58.89 feet. At the same time the appellants granted to the Glanzbergs an easement or right of way over a 25 foot wide driveway which ran the length of the westerly side of the lot. The title to the driveway was retained by the appellants. Apparently the Glanzbergs were acting as straw parties in this transaction and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Peirce AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Summit Towne Centre, Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Petrosky v. ZON. BD., UPPER CHICHESTER TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Andress v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. BIG BASS LAKE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. WarrenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API