Legal Opinion

Beary v. Container General Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1987No. 00454PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s (Container) motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial. We modify judgment and affirm.

The instant action commenced when appellee/plaintiff, Jerry Beary (Beary), filed suit sounding in trespass against Pennsylvania Electric Company 1 and appellant Glass Containers Corporation, now Container General Corporation. Container joined Edwards Tank Erection, Inc. (Edwards), Beary’s employer, as an additional defendant upon a theory of contractual indemnity.

The first trial commenced October 19, 1981 2 and, at the conclusion…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Pasquale v. Ohio Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Zito v. Merit Outlet StoresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Todd Heller, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Polett v. Public Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API