Legal Opinion

Minteer v. Wolfe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1982No. 991 and 1024PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an action in quiet title involving an easement by prescription.

Appellant, Mavilla 0. Minteer, 1 instituted the instant action to quiet title and to enjoin appellee-defendants from interfering with appellant’s use of a lane located in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. The lane in question, extending from a township road to appellant’s land, traverses the boundary line of contiguous tracts of land owned by appellee-defendants. Appellant’s claim to an easement is based on prescription or adverse use of the lane for a period exceeding twenty-one years.

Following a non-jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Bodman v. BodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Shaffer v. Baylor's Lake Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Hostetter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Dunlap v. LarkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Hash v. SofinowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Sprankle v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Tomlinson v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API