Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Respondent filed a complaint in unlawful detainer against appellant. Service of summons was made upon the manager of appellant corporation, but no answer to the complaint was filed and appellant’s default was entered. Appellant then moved to set aside the default, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473. It accompanied its motion with a copy of its proposed answer. The motion was denied. Thereafter the court entered judgment finding appellant guilty of unlawful detainer, forfeiting appellant’s lease, granting respondent possession of the premises, and assessing damages for unlawful…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Samuels v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Rankin v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Gaskill v. TrainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Prichard v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- J. B. Hill Co. v. PinqueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- WDT-WINCHESTER v. NilssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Smith v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- De La Vara v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.