Legal Opinion
WDT-WINCHESTER v. Nilsson
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 4, 1994No. H011285PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Defendant lessee Eleanor Nilsson appeals from a judgment in unlawful detainer in favor of plaintiff lessor WDT-Winchester (WDT). On appeal, Nilsson makes the following claims: (1) the trial court abused its discretion when it denied her request for relief from jury trial waiver; (2) the trial court erred in relying upon Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1161.1 as that provision was not applicable to these proceedings; (3) assuming arguendo that section 1161.1 was applicable, the court relied upon an erroneous interpretation of the statute as well as faulty calculations of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Central Delta Water Agency v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Kruger v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2014
- Underwood v. CorsinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Culver Center Partners East 1, LP v. BAJA FRESH WESTLAKE VILLAGE, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASS'N v. BugnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.