J. B. Hill Co. v. Pinque
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Everts & Ewing, South & Ross, and W. E. Simpson, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action was brought to recover the possession of certain premises, together with damages. The complaint was in two counts. The first set up, in ordinary form, a cause of action in ejectment. The second alleged that the premises, consisting of a storeroom, had been held by the defendant Pinque under a written lease from one Keosheyan, and that the plaintiff, who,had acquired the interest of Keosheyan, had elected, under the terms of the lease, to terminate it, and forfeit the, rights of the defendant.
Judgment went in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of the premises, for three…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaskill v. TrainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Gage v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Simpson v. ApplegateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Chipman v. EmericCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Mossi v. FairbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Igauye v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Johnson v. SanchesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.