Legal Opinion
Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 23, 1996No. 84357PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Dispositive of the Osteopathic Hospital Founders Association and Kenneth H. Sto-ver’s [jointly “hospital”] dismissal quest is our answer to the question whether the July 30, 1993 nisi prius order setting the amount of sanctions to be paid by the appellant-lawyer is appealable as final. We answer in the affirmative and deny the motion to dismiss with prejudice to renewal.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
Along with another lawyer, Sellers represented the Vari Hammonds’ estate in a negligence action against the hospital. During the litigation plaintiffs counsel moved to strike hospital’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edmund A. Rachel, AKA Peter Rachel, D/B/A Wildlife Interiors, Plaintiff v. Banana Republic, Inc., Fisher Development, Inc., and the Gap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gilliland v. Chronic Pain Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Centorp Corp. v. Gulf Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Ada v. ArlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Williams v. MulvihillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Piette v. Bradley & LesebergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Winston v. Stewart & Elder, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.