Legal Opinion

Piette v. Bradley & Leseberg

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1996No. 88282PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This appeal from a trial judge’s order disqualifying a law firm based on conflict of interest was correctly brought under the provisions of 12 O.S. 1991 § 953, Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Association, 917 P.2d 6 (Okl.1996).

The trial judge’s disqualification order is summarily reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing. If, after holding a hearing, the trial judge should determine that plaintiffs attorneys should be disqualified, its order of disqualification must include a specific factual finding that attorney Wagner had knowledge of material and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lansing-Delaware Water District v. Oak Lane Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Parker v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Towne v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Arkansas Valley State Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Miami Business Services, LLC v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. Hayes v. Central States Orthopedic Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Towne v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API