Legal Opinion

Gilliland v. Chronic Pain Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1995No. 83339PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

Two issues are tendered by the appellee’s quest for the appeal’s dismissal: (1) Is the order setting aside an arbitration award and directing the parties to relaunch the arbitration process before another panel appealable as a final prejudgment disposition? and, if this be answered in the affirmative, (2) Is this appeal timely? We answer both questions in the affirmative and deny the motion to dismiss with prejudice to renewal.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

This case presents a history that is very complicated and convoluted. 1 We confine ourselves to those procedural complexities…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Mayhue v. MayhueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Foreman v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. National Diversified Business Services, Inc. v. Corporate Financial Opportunities, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. County of Hawaii v. UNIDEV, LLC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API