Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 The threshold and determinative issue in this cause is whether under the facts and circumstances, particular to this case, the appellants have standing to challenge a trial judge’s bench rulings which [by way of sanction] limited their participation in proceedings then pending before her court. For reasons delineated below, we determine that Richard Funk and John T. Schmidt [lawyers or appellants] do lack standing and dismiss their appeal with prejudice to renewal.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Appellants represent Gulf Oil Corporation, now Chevron USA, Inc. [Gulf *547Oil], a defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Jackie Kleiner v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway, George W. Morosani v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. LangwayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Garnett v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Murray County v. Homesales, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.