Legal Opinion

Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1999No. 87,964PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

¶ 1 The threshold and determinative issue in this cause is whether under the facts and circumstances, particular to this case, the appellants have standing to challenge a trial judge’s bench rulings which [by way of sanction] limited their participation in proceedings then pending before her court. For reasons delineated below, we determine that Richard Funk and John T. Schmidt [lawyers or appellants] do lack standing and dismiss their appeal with prejudice to renewal.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Appellants represent Gulf Oil Corporation, now Chevron USA, Inc. [Gulf *547Oil], a defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Jackie Kleiner v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway, George W. Morosani v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. LangwayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Garnett v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Murray County v. Homesales, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API