Williams v. Mulvihill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Two questions are dispositive of appellant’s [Williams’] quest for predecisional procedural relief: (1) Shall this proceeding for certiorari to review a certified interlocutory order in probate be recast into an appeal from mid-probate judgment? 1 and (2) Shall this court vacate or modify the trial court’s requirement for a $100,000.00 bond to suspend the clerk’s disbursement of the oil and gas proceeds now on deposit in his office? 2
We answer both questions in the affirmative. The decision before us is a true “judgment” within the meaning of § 721(10) 3 — i.e., an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- E.B. Jones Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Board of Law Library Trustees v. State Ex Rel. PetuskeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Worthington v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- In Re the Estate of KizziarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Estate of Estes v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- McGehee v. Arvest Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.