Legal Opinion

Williams v. Mulvihill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1993No. 79453PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

Two questions are dispositive of appellant’s [Williams’] quest for predecisional procedural relief: (1) Shall this proceeding for certiorari to review a certified interlocutory order in probate be recast into an appeal from mid-probate judgment? 1 and (2) Shall this court vacate or modify the trial court’s requirement for a $100,000.00 bond to suspend the clerk’s disbursement of the oil and gas proceeds now on deposit in his office? 2

We answer both questions in the affirmative. The decision before us is a true “judgment” within the meaning of § 721(10) 3 — i.e., an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. E.B. Jones Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Board of Law Library Trustees v. State Ex Rel. PetuskeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Worthington v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. In Re the Estate of KizziarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Estate of Estes v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. McGehee v. Arvest Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API