Legal Opinion
Martin v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 22, 1998No. 87,994PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, V.C.J.
¶ 1 Plaintiffs contract as a non-tenured Spanish teacher in the Latta school system was not renewed. She sued in the District Court, first naming the Principal Johnson as defendant, and then added Superintendent Hoover and the School District. Before her case made it to trial Plaintiff was assessed a sanction by way of attorneys fees for attempting to amend her petition, and then suffered the ultimate sanction of having her case dismissed for failure to attend a continuation session of her own deposition of which she had been given notice. Additional fees and costs accompanied…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Holloway v. SkinnerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Pellegrino v. State, Ex Rel. Cameron University, Ex Rel. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Harmon v. CradduckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Shephard v. Compsource OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.