Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Foreclosure of mortgage on lines of street railway and appurtenant property in the city of Los Angeles, alleged to have been given as security for an issue of bonds of the Pacific Railway Company. The defendants in the action are numerous, but only the company named prosecutes the present appeal. There was a former appeal from the judgment by certain other defendants (Illinois Trust etc. Bank v. Pacific *336Ry. Co., 115 Cal. 285); the questions there raised, however, have little or no affinity with those made here; these relate mainly to the personal liability of the Pacific Bail way…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- G. V. B. Min. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Mechanics' Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. C. A. Hoover Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Thompson v. Laboringman's Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- In re Progressive Wall Paper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.