Thompson v. Laboringman's Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Tucker County. • Action by A. Thompson againt P. H. Murphy and others-Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant the Laboringman’s Mercantile & Manufacturing Company, brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Poffenbarger, Judge:
The Laboringman’s Mercantile and Manufacturing Company seeks the reversal of a judgment against it in favor of A. Thompson, for the sum of $407.44, rendered by the circuit court of Tucker county, in an action of debt on a promissory note.
This action is similar in some respects to that of Third National Bank v. Laboringman's Mercantile and Manufacturing Co., decided by this Court and reported in 49 S. E. 544. Some of the principles announced in that case are applicable and controlling here.
The note, bearing date January 24, 1901, is for the sum of $382.39, was payable…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Owings v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- Smith v. . KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Bennecke v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- First National Bank of Wellsburg v. KimberlandsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co. v. Mercedes Plantation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Elk Valley Coal Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Pan Coal Co. v. Garland Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.