Gold-Mining Co. v. National Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
Erbob to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Colorado. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
This was an action by the Rocky Mountain Rational Bank against the Union Gold-Mining Company of Colorado, to recover a balance of overdraft, due upon tbe account kept át tbe bank, in the name of the company. The balanee of over-draft, exceeding $20,000, was created by drafts or checks drawn by one Sabin, who, claiming to be the authorized agent of the company, acted in its name, and made deposits frota time to time to its credit. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the bank for the amount of the over-draft with interest ($30,358.32), and from the judgment entered upon that verdict the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Pangborn v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Sanchez v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
3Cited by140 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- The People v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.