Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of Chicago
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. In equity. Decree in favor of the complainant. The defendant appealed. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatciiford
These are appeals by David Armstrong, receiver of the Fidelity National Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio, from decrees rendered against him by the Circuit Court of the. United States for the Southern District of Ohio, in two suits ih equity, brought against him in that court by the American Exchange Rational Bank of Chicago, Illinois. The first case will be referred to'as No. 1110, and the second case as No 1111.
No. 1110 was commenced on the 5th of November,. 1887, by a petition, which was demurred to by the defendant. 'The demurrer was overruled, the defendant answered thé.petition, and. there was a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Planters' Bank v. Union BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- White v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Ticonic National Bank v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.