Legal Opinion
Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 27, 2011No. Case No. 09-CV-1039 (PJS/JSM)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
In this lawsuit, plaintiff Donald Kapps, M.D., seeks to recover for injuries he suffered after the tip of a catheter made by defendant Biosense Webster, Inc. (“Biosense”) and reprocessed by defendant Ascent Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (“Ascent”)1 broke off in his heart during a medical procedure at the Mayo Clinic. Kapps filed a motion for summary judgment, Biosense filed a motion for summary judgment, Ascent filed two motions for summary judgment, and the parties together filed the equivalent of eight motions to exclude expert testimony under Daubert v.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Green Plains Otter Tail, LLC v. Pro-Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Selective Ins. Co. of S.C. v. SelaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Huggins v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Kruszka v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.