Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Huggins v. Stryker Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 25, 2013No. Civil No. 09-1250 (JRT/JJK)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Robert L. Huggins brings claims against medical device companies Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation (collectively, “Stryker”). Huggins alleges that pain pumps manufactured and distributed by Stryker, which a surgeon inserted into Huggins’ shoulder following surgery in February 2002, caused chondrolysis (a condition involving rapid cartilage degeneration) in his shoulder. Huggins advances various product liability theories, sounding in both strict liability and negligence. This matter is currently before the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Paulos v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  3. My Pillow, Inc. v. LMP Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
  4. Aqua-Care Marketing LLC v. Hydro Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2015
  5. Bell v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API