Legal Opinion
Kruszka v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 19, 2014No. Civil No. 07-2793 (DWF/JJK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Corporation’s (“Novartis” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 116) against Plaintiffs Candice Kruszka (“Kruszka” or “Plaintiff’) and her husband Alan Kruszka (“Mr. Kruszka”) for claims that Kruszka suffered osteonecrosis of the jaw (“ONJ”) (or dead jaw bone) as a result of using Novartis’s product Aredia®; (2) Novartis’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony (Causation Testimony) of Plaintiffs’ Case-Specific…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charolette Payne v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Kruszka v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Rowland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Metro Sales, Inc. v. Core Consulting Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- James v. Coloplast Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.