State v. RATHBONE III
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant challenges his sentence imposed pursuant to a plea agreement. Although we have jurisdiction, ORS 138.050, we conclude that his claim of error may not be reviewed on direct appeal and affirm.
On May 29, 1990, defendant was arrested and charged with manufacture of a controlled substance, methamphetamine; possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine; and possession of a controlled substance, hashish. ORS 475.992. The indictment alleged that defendant’s activities were part of a manufacture or delivery scheme or network. Defendant demurred to that allegation on the ground that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. RATHBONE IIICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Gabler v. Embassy Suites HotelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RATHBONE IIICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. LeDonneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. LeDonneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.