State v. LeDonne
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled guilty to manufacture of a controlled substance as part of a scheme or network. He appeals from the sentence imposed under category 8 of the crime seriousness peale, arguing that the court erred because, after he was sentenced, the “scheme or network” language was held to violate Article I, sections 20 and 21, of the Oregon Constitution. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 201 (1991). He contends that the sentence may be reviewed under ORS 138.222(4)(b), which allows review of a claim that the sentencing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RATHBONE IIICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. RATHBONE IIICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Gabler v. Embassy Suites HotelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LeDonneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SebastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992