Legal Opinion

State v. RATHBONE III

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1991No. 90-CR-0603; CA A68792PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled guilty to five counts of delivery of a controlled substance as part of a drug manufacture or delivery scheme or network, ORS 475.992; conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance as part of a drug manufacture or delivery scheme or network, ORS 475.992; six counts of possession of a controlled substance as part of a drug manufacture or delivery scheme or network, ORS 475.992; racketeering, ORS 166.720; and perjury. ORS 162.065. He challenges his sentences. We affirm.

The facts are set out in State v. Rathbone I, 110 Or App 414, 823 P2d 430 (1991).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RATHBONE IIICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RATHBONE IIICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. FernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API