State v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Oregon
(Cases Consolidated for Opinion Only)
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
In these four appeals, which we have consolidated for decision, each defendant has appealed from a sentence that is conceded to be within the presumptive range of the sentencing guidelines. ORS 137.010; OAR 253-04-001. The state has moved to dismiss each appeal. It argues that, because each sentence is within the presumptive range, they are not subject to review.
As part of the sentencing guidelines, the legislature enacted ORS 138.222(7), which allows either the state or the defendant to appeal from “ajudgment of conviction based on the sentence [imposed under the guidelines] * * * subject to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. Orsi/GauthierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. FarmerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. SlawsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.