Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Rose Brothers Lumber & Supply Co. v. Clousing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 21, 1936No. 30,882PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Devaney, Chief Justice.
Proceedings for writ of mandamus to require appellant to issue two biiilding permits for the erection of certain buildings on respondent’s premises.
Respondent is a corporation and has for many years been engaged in the wrecking and construction of buildings and the sale of building materials. It owns and operates a lumberyard for the •purpose of carrying on this business in the city of Minneapolis. Appellant is the inspector of buildings in the city of Minneapolis.
On April 10, 1934, a fire occurred on the premises of the respondent which partially destroyed several…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Higgins v. LacroixSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- State v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Paron v. City of ShakopeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Dadukian v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.