State v. Taubert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Erom a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, Montgomery, J., convicting him of a violation of the ordinance of the city of Minneapolis, and from an order denying him a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant was convicted of maintaining a tannery in the city of Minneapolis without having obtained permission therefor from the city council. The ordinance under which he was convicted provides : “No person * * * shall hereafter erect, keep or maintain within the limits of the city of Minneapolis any * * * tannery * * * unless such person * * * shall have obtained permission from the city council of the city of Minneapolis authorizing the same: * * * provided that this ordinance shall not apply to any building or structure in the city of Minneapolis already used and occupied by any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Inhabitants of Quincy v. KennardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- City of St. Louis v. FischerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- City of St. Paul v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Lerner v. City of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Bluemound Amusement Park, Inc. v. MayorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Rose Brothers Lumber & Supply Co. v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.