Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Remick v. Clousing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1939No. 31,976PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Appeal from an order sustaining demurrer to respondent’s answer in a proceeding in mandamus to compel the building inspector of the city of Minneapolis to issue a plasterer’s permit to petitioner.

The case involves the validity of an ordinance, part of the building code of Minneapolis, requiring a license from the city council as a condition precedent to the issuance of a permit to carry on the business of plastering. Petitioner claims that he is qualified to •obtain but admits that he has not applied for or obtained a license. He contends that the ordinance requiring…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Lehon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API