Legal Opinion

J.C. Penney Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1986No. 85-1830PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrey, J.

Under the provisions of R.C. Chapter 5739, sales tax, and R.C. Chapter 5741, use tax, different kinds of property are either taxable or exempt. Broadly speaking, the issue in this case is whether or not the Board of Tax Appeals properly applied the provisions of these two chapters to the J.C. Penney catalog operation. Therefore we begin our discussion with a description of that operation.

When a customer wishes to place an order from the J.C. Penney catalog, he may place his order by filling out and mailing in an order form directly to the catalog distribution center. In the alternative, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Botkins Grain & Feed Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Timken Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Interactive Information Systems, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. AngocoSuperior Court of Guam · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API