Legal Opinion

Ratner v. Stark County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1988No. 86-1126PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In Ratner I, supra, we held the following:

“Although the sale price is the ‘best evidence’ of true value of real property for tax purposes, it is not the only evidence. A review of independent appraisals based upon factors other than the sale price is appropriate where it is shown that the sale price does not reflect true value. (Columbus Bd. of Edn. v. Fountain Square Assoc., Ltd. [1984], 9 Ohio St. 3d 218, 219, construed.)”

We made this ruling after reviewing the pertinent decisions which discuss the adoption of the sale price as the true value in money of real property for tax purposes. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Columbus Board of Education v. Fountain Square Associates, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Howard v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API