Legal Opinion

SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 1994-0431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 119.] SFA FOLIO COLLECTIONS, INC., APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Tracy,

1995-Ohio-130.] Taxation—Use tax—Out-of-state direct mail retailer not required to collect use tax, when "substantial nexus" with Ohio exists, when—R.C. 5741.01(H)(1) is constitutional. (No. 94-431—Submitted May 9, 1995—Decided August 16, 1995.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 91-K-295. __________________ {¶ 1} SFA Folio Collections,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Borders Online v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API