Legal Opinion

SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 94-431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

According to Clause 3, Section 8, Article I of the United States Constitution, “[t]he Congress shall have power * * * to regulate commerce * * * among the several States.” The United States Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to prohibit certain state actions that interfere with or burden interstate commerce. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992), 504 U.S. 298, 112 S.Ct. 1904, 119 L.Ed.2d 91. In Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady (1977), 430 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 1076, 51 L.Ed.2d 326, the court set forth a four-part test to enforce this dormant Commerce Clause provision. A state tax will…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crutchfield Corp. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Borders Online v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. St. Tammany Parish Tax Collector v. Barnesandnoble.ComDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
  4. In re BarnesandNoble.com, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department v. Barnesandnoble.com LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API