Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
I
The first issue presented is whether the Board of Tax Appeals properly ruled that the purchase of the clinker producing system, as evidenced by a single purchase agreement stating a single price, could be divided into taxable and non-taxable purchases for the purpose of tax assessment pursuant to R. C. 5739.01(E)(2).1
Appellant contends, in essence, that this division is unlawful because it purchased a system under one agreement and for one price. In addition, appellant argues that such a division violates the primary use test enunciated in Mead Corp. v. Glander (1950), 153 Ohio St. 539, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Akron Home Medical Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Bird & Son, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Moulton Gas Serv., Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.