Legal Opinion

Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1981No. 80-1748PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

I

The first issue presented is whether the Board of Tax Appeals properly ruled that the purchase of the clinker producing system, as evidenced by a single purchase agreement stating a single price, could be divided into taxable and non-taxable purchases for the purpose of tax assessment pursuant to R. C. 5739.01(E)(2).1

Appellant contends, in essence, that this division is unlawful because it purchased a system under one agreement and for one price. In addition, appellant argues that such a division violates the primary use test enunciated in Mead Corp. v. Glander (1950), 153 Ohio St. 539, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Akron Home Medical Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bird & Son, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Moulton Gas Serv., Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API