Timken Co. v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The main issue before this court is whether certain equipment used to cool, circulate and supply liquids, gas and steam used during and in taxpayer’s production of steel tubing and roller bearings was excepted from use tax by reason of R. C. 5739.01(E)(2) and 5739.-01(S).
R. C. 5739.01(E)(2) and R. C. 5739.01(S) except certain sales from the sales tax and use tax by excluding them from the definition of retail sales. R. C. 5739.01 provides, in pertinent part:
“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:
ÍÍ # * #
“(2) To…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- White Motor Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bird & Son, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- General Motors Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- J.C. Penney Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- General Motors Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.