Legal Opinion
MacIsaac & Menke Co. v. Cardox Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1961No. Civ. 24645PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Plaintiff MacIsaac and Menke Company brought suit against defendant Cardox Corporation to recover their reasonable costs for work performed under a written subcontract, as modified by an executed oral agreement. Defendant American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, as surety for Cardox, was joined as a party defendant. The Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles viras the owner of the Valley Steam Plant on which the work was done and was joined as a defendant since it held funds of $8,991.11 following service upon it of a withhold notice. Plaintiff recovered a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- C.A. MacOmber v. L. M. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Gogo v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Esgro Central, Inc. v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- General Motors Corp. v. Northrop Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Healy v. BrewsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.