Legal Opinion
Gogo v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 1941No. Civ. 12805PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiffs and defendant entered into a contract whereby plaintiffs agreed to do excavation and construction work for a dam. This action was commenced to recover a judgment for excavation work which they performed but which was not included in the contract. The action was tried without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs for $59,590.80, from which judgment defendant has appealed.
Defendant published on April 6, 1937, a notice inviting bids for the construction of the spillway of San Gabriel Dam No. 1. Copies of the notice and of the plans and specifications were furnished…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Jefferson Hotel Co. v. BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.