Legal Opinion
Overton v. Walt Disney Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 2006No. B179854PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In Morillion v. Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575 [94 Cal.Rptr.2d 3, 995 P.2d 139] (Morillion), the California Supreme Court held that employees must be compensated for travel time when their employer requires them to travel to a work site on employer-provided buses. Plaintiff, a former Disneyland employee, was assigned parking in a lot one mile from the employee entrance to Disneyland. Disney provided a shuttle from this lot to the employee entrance. Plaintiff brought a proposed class action on behalf of all Disney employees who parked in the satellite lot, seeking…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Joseluis Alcantar v. Hobart ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Novoa v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Cervantez v. Celestica Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.